How HAVO checks

HAVO keeps three things apart: what a source says, what HAVO has checked, and what still lacks evidence. The aim is to let you decide with enough information, not to decide for you.

Four steps for every fact

  1. Record the source first

    Every fact carries its publisher, link, the date HAVO read it and the type of source. No source, no publication.

  2. The right project, the right part

    Project, zone, tower and phase are kept apart. A fact about one phase is never applied to the whole project.

  3. Keep contradictions visible

    When two sources disagree, HAVO shows both rather than picking the nicer number.

  4. Check again on a schedule

    Records are read again within 90 days, or sooner when someone reports new information.

Rules that do not bend

An asking price is not a transaction price

HAVO has no licensed source of transaction prices today. If prices appear later, they will be called “observed asking prices”, with the sample size and how duplicates were removed.

Documents are evidence, not a guarantee

HAVO can list documents and what has been checked. It does not replace a lawyer, notary or authority in saying a transaction is safe.

Official sources come first

Government records and original documents come first, then company disclosures. Marketing material is always labelled as the developer's claim.

No ranking and no overall score

There is no leaderboard, livability score or “best” label. Any future sponsorship will never change the order of results.

Reading the label on each project

Every project card says what HAVO holds about it, so you know whether you are reading a full dossier or a single line of identity.

Full dossierSource notesIdentity onlySourcedPartly sourcedNot verifiedSources disagree

Related policies